|
|
Main Discussion - Norwich City
Topic has 48 replies.
  
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
 25/07/2008, 4:35 PM
|
blahblahblah
 
Joined on 11/05/2006
Marcus Evans' underground cave lair
Posts 4,985
|
Re: Much to gain. Little to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
 Houston Canary wrote: | |
There could be any one of a thousand reasons why other teams didn't come in for him. - blahblahblah
I haven't been following Fotheringham at all, so I don't know why he didn't go to Charlton. All my energy was pent up in hoping for Doherty to not sign. Do you know we were scored on 10 goals more than the 2nd worst defense in the Prem his first years here? That is a huge gap between worst and second worst. We were not even CLOSE to being 2nd worst. The first 2 years back in the Coca Cola were not any better considering the drop in competition, and still we did much of nothing to alleviate the problem. Last year, he cost us a few games, and tried his best to cost us the game at Southampton. He is a liability, not an asset, and that is why nobody else signed him, not 1000 other reasons.
|
|
So statistics are for losers, which makes rambling nonsense dressed up as pseudo-statistics...
Anyway, I think we've persued this as far as we can. Some people think Doherty is a liability, others don't. No point having 29 pages of debate about that. I bet Jesus would have given Doherty a contract though. ![Smile [:)]](/cs/emoticons/emotion-1.gif)
On the Ball City - Never Mind...
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
25/07/2008, 4:46 PM
|
Neil Cluckcaster
Joined on 20/10/2006
Posts 485
|
Re: Much to gain. Little to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Carlos Valderrama wrote: | | Neil Cluckcaster wrote: | | Carlos Valderrama wrote: | | Neil Cluckcaster wrote: | | blahblahblah wrote: | | Neil Cluckcaster wrote: | | BlyBlyBabes wrote: | |
Who? Glenn.
It'll certainly be his team this season .............. but from List Q.
And if he builds a successful team from List Q we'll be saying sad farewells soon enough unless Cullum comes in and enables him to take things to the next level.
On the other hand...........
OTBC
|
|
Not only are the incoming players "ordinary" (despite the usual dreamers' fanfare)....Roeder will not be able to motivate them beyond the early stages of the season and into where it starts to hurt......
Far from being the best thing since sliced bread (according to the usual suspects)...he is dull and lacking in the charisma required to bring the best out of limited ability. For that you need a Harry Redknapp....and Roeder will never be a Harry as long as he has a hole in his arse.....
|
|
Ok Mr. CluckCaster / FriedFriedBrains / whatever you're calling yourself to bump your own propaganda today, who is the man for the job if it ain't Roeder ? Because good old 'Arry already 'as a job, innit !
|
|
Peter Cullum could get "him" (a dynamic personality) here...but Smith will only ever get "left-overs". It all depends on what you're happy with and how limited your ambition.
Roeder personifies Smith....and that again (like Grant) will ultimately be the problem.
|
|
You have obviously forgotten that Pompey have a mega rich owner of their own and that they qualified for europe next season.
You really make me laugh, you came back with your extreme views and to start with worded stuff rationally and well. Now you have settled back in you have resorted back to the OTT bile you continually spouted until you got banned. You sir are just as pathetic as the over confident Delia loving brigade. 'Peter Cullum could get him', dont make me laugh, do you honestly believe that!!
|
|
Oh dear...I think you'll find that Harry did most of his dealings by not paying over the odds for anybody...but getting quality in.
Dream on and enjoy the candyfloss while it lasts......and who is it actually throwing the personal stuff about? Not me sunshine.....I'll leave that you.
|
|
I will enjoy watching the new look squad start next season and I will worry about how we finance the move to the next level. I will remain optimistic that the search for new investment will be successful.
Thing is though our views are completely different, I look on with positivity and try to view every emerging situation objectively. Wheras you on the other hand have very extreme ideals and come across as consumed with hate against the current regime, and that is putting it mildly sunshine!!
My advice (if you want it) is calm it down a couple of notches.
|
|
I'm always calm....it's just that some on here don't care to hear an alternative view to their own. You might have umpteen years ahead of you during which to be complacent...but I've got 40 odd years of support already behind me...and have paid many thousands of pounds into the Carrow Road kitty in that time. Maybe when you've experienced some genuine good times and paid enough money into the club to fully expect a return, you may well look back on this period one day with disdain.
Let's just hope you eventually get to see some proper football at Carrow Road to use as a comparison......
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
25/07/2008, 4:58 PM
|
7rew
Joined on 08/03/2006
Manchester
Posts 1,454
|
Re: Much to gain. Little to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah Carlos leave Cluck alone!
He's been a fan since before you or I were born, therefore is right about what our future direction and you can't argue with him. It not that he just wants to gamble the long term future of the club for glory now because in 20 years he will be a) dead or b) dribbling insensibly in a home not knowing who he is or the prime minister is, let alone who the the star player of NCFC is.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 (49 items)
|
< 1 2 3 4 |
|
|
|
pink'un » Have Your Say » Main Discussion... » Much to gain. Little to lose.
|
|
|
|