|
|
Main Discussion - Norwich City
Topic has 154 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 11:03 AM
|
Big Down Under
Joined on 16/12/2007
Posts 341
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
Big Down Under wrote: | WeAreYellows49 wrote: | |
"We are sorry, this video is no longer available".
|
|
Sorry I hit post too early. I haven't seen that video, but Baldwin covers it on the link above. From his article I believe the quote you are probably referring to is;
"If somebody comes along and says 'I will put £20 million into Norwich
City Football Club on the playing side...', not just on the day-to-day
scrabbling about trying to survive but on the playing side, I think
that the supporters wouldn't forgive me if I turned it down, or Michael
and I turned it down."
The key words here are surely 'not just';
in other words, the £20 million for the playing side would need to be
on top of the funds needed for scrabbling about.
The analysis is from Kevin Baldwin, not me.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 11:06 AM
|
T
Joined on 25/09/2007
Posts 552
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
the word relinquish does not indicate whether they were willing to relinquish their shares for cash or for free and the words not if they buy our shares actually suggests that they were looking to sell their shares but just selling their shares is not suffecient so again it is down to how you decide to interpret the words
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 11:07 AM
|
Big Down Under
Joined on 16/12/2007
Posts 341
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Carrow you are once again just cutting out the bits that support what you want to believe. Now lets look at the WHOLE quote (freom Jan 2007 AGM) from that BBC link I gave you;
"Nobody
has ever come forward and said `I'll give you this amount of money for
a seat on the board.` Nobody's ever done it," she said. "And if somebody offered Michael and I a large amount of money for our shares what's that going to do? "It's going to give us a lot of money, but it's not going to do anything for the club," she added. Delia admitted she would consider selling up, but only if it was in the best long-term interests of Norwich City. "The
only way we would relinquish our shares is if somebody's going to put
invest in the football with serious money for the squad, and it has to
be someone honourable," she added. "They
have to be people that we all think would be good custodians of this
football club, because we nearly lost it ten years ago and that's a
possibility again if it's not looked after properly and nurtured," she
added. You can only back up your argument by twisting her words and selectively editing them.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 11:14 AM
|
Big Down Under
Joined on 16/12/2007
Posts 341
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh and I'm not labling Cullum as a bad guy. I have stated clearly I would love to have him in control of the club. I really hope that, when he liquidates more of his cash (he 'only' has 60m remember) he will put in a proper bid for the club. You are trying to turn it into a black and white debate where you are either pro Delia or pro Cullum, I am neither, I am pro NCFC. Just because I call you up on your anti Delia bias doesn't mean I have a pro Delia bias or an anti Cullum bias. I will leave that gang joining for the children.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 11:23 AM
|
Big Down Under
Joined on 16/12/2007
Posts 341
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
WeAreYellows49 wrote: | |
"that video is not available in your country" Does it say anything that isn't covered by the Kevin Baldin argument above?
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 11:39 AM
|
Mr.Carrow
Joined on 06/12/2003
Posts 2,001
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 11:45 AM
|
Mr.Carrow
Joined on 06/12/2003
Posts 2,001
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
Big Down Under wrote: | Mr Carrow you are once again just cutting out the bits that support what you want to believe. Now lets look at the WHOLE quote (freom Jan 2007 AGM) from that BBC link I gave you;
"Nobody has ever come forward and said `I'll give you this amount of money for a seat on the board.` Nobody's ever done it," she said.
"And if somebody offered Michael and I a large amount of money for our shares what's that going to do?
"It's going to give us a lot of money, but it's not going to do anything for the club," she added.
Delia admitted she would consider selling up, but only if it was in the best long-term interests of Norwich City.
"The only way we would relinquish our shares is if somebody's going to put invest in the football with serious money for the squad, and it has to be someone honourable," she added.
"They have to be people that we all think would be good custodians of this football club, because we nearly lost it ten years ago and that's a possibility again if it's not looked after properly and nurtured," she added.
You can only back up your argument by twisting her words and selectively editing them.
|
|
The quote i made is word-for-word from your link to the Baldwin article. As the one above is from a short BBC summary of events i would suggest it is the one which has been edited. Your last comment is wonderful coming from the boards master twister. You are one of those people who is always right, even when your wrong.....
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 12:10 PM
|
T
Joined on 25/09/2007
Posts 552
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
Mr C _ I can totally see that yours is a legitimate interpretation of the words but if you look at the other quotes they could also be interpreted in another way is all I'm saying. There was never the direct confirmatory follow up question asked "so exactly what do you mean by that " or "so so you mean that you would give away shares/control for free". It is rather academic though as the NCFC statement following the PC story in they EDP is very unambiguous _ they are seeking 16m for the money for the overall shares.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/07/2008, 12:33 PM
|
Mr.Carrow
Joined on 06/12/2003
Posts 2,001
|
Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|
|
I think the confusion here is that the Baldwin quotes are what she said in response to questions during the AGM, whereas the bbc one is an interview with Tim Gudgin after the AGM. They are different quotes (both accurate), not different versions of the same statements.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
pink'un » Have Your Say » Main Discussion... » Re: Re. Cullum, let's not forget...
|
|
|
|