Stoke boss Tony Pulis feels defeat to Norwich City is real kick in the teeth

Tony Pulis conceded Stoke's profligacy in front of John Ruddy's goal had ensured Bradley Johnson's athletic header decided the game. Picture: Paul Chesterton / Focus Images Tony Pulis conceded Stoke's profligacy in front of John Ruddy's goal had ensured Bradley Johnson's athletic header decided the game. Picture: Paul Chesterton / Focus Images

Monday, November 5, 2012
9:43 AM

Tony Pulis exited Carrow Road with a sense of injustice after insisting his Stoke side were on the wrong end of two key refereeing decisions in the Potters’ 1-0 Premier League defeat.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The experienced manager renewed his pleas for the officials to get extra retrospective help following Charlie Adam’s first half caution for simulation.

Pulis’ ire was compounded by the circumstances surrounding Bradley Johnson’s superb match-winning header when Andy Wilkinson was also booked after the left-back was adjudged to have clipped Robert Snodgrass. Pulis revealed he spoke to referee Andre Marriner immediately following the game to make his feelings crystal clear.

“The goal was disappointing. I have just seen it on the television and I have been in to see the referee. I just thought it certainly wasn’t a free kick,” he said. “When the lad falls both Andre and the linesman are so close to it. He has booked Charlie in the first half for diving. I have had a look at that and (Javier) Garrido pushed him, so that is a double kick in the teeth when he gets both of those decisions wrong and even worse they score from it.

“I thought that the officials got the decisions wrong, and they were big decisions for us. On the basis that the referee has booked Charlie for what he perceives to be a dive, even though Garrido has pushed him in the back, the lad has then gone down for the free kick which leads to their goal, when Wilko has not made any contact with him.”

Pulis was diplomatic when pressed whether he was suggesting Snodgrass had actually conned the officials.

“No, all I am saying is if you look at it again, or the referee and his assistant look at it again, I don’t think Andy Wilkinson touches him. I have seen it three times,” he said. “How many mistakes did we make today? How many did Norwich? The thing is the referee’s mistakes will always be highlighted. The disappointing thing is that has led to the goal. You hope and pray every time you play a game of football that the referee doesn’t have an influence on the game. I think what we have to appreciate is that he has given the decision he sees on the day. He sees it different to what I have. When it sees it on the television he might have a different opinion.”

The Stoke boss is adamant some form of panel should convene to adjudicate on the most contentious issues following each weekend’s Premier League games.

“It should be retrospective on Mondays. I think there should be a panel that sits because we are adding more pressure on to them,” he said. “That panel would decide whether a player has dived or not. The referee should only make the decision if he is absolutely 100pc certain that someone has cheated. That would take a bit of pressure off referees, which I am all for. I think the referees could look at the game again and he picks the (contentious) ones and he sends them off to the panel. Having said that, maybe Alan Hansen would pick them for him.”

Pulis conceded Stoke’s profligacy in front of John Ruddy’s goal had also ensured Johnson’s athletic header decided the game.

“Apart from the cross in the first half that went right across the goal I can’t remember Asmir (Begovic) having to making a save,” he said. “Second half, I thought we looked like the home team and the two best chances of the game fell to Jon (Walters) and Kenwyne (Jones). You look at his chance and he is so good in the air, but he heads it straight at Ruddy. Normally he would head that in, so its disappointing for us to come away with nothing. We’ve got to start taking our chances. you look at Jon’s chance and you look at Kenwyne’s and they’ve got to be goals in the Premier League. Once again this season, we’ve played a game which we didn’t deserve to lose and, personally, I think we should have won the match.”

Stoke’s display was symptomatic of the visitors’ early season form, according to their manager.

“It has been like that for five or six games. We have to start winning games. I think I have a better squad here and we play some good football at times,” said Pulis. “We played on angles when we had to and with the likes of Charlie and one or two others in the side they will keep the ball better and move it. But I don’t want negative possession when it goes backwards and sideways. I always want positive. Some disagree with it, but that is the way it is. We are better this year but we need to get the results to show we are better.”

16 comments

  • Aha! - the ethered comment did find its way through. It is uncensored, so what was the point of ethering it? Everything else got through without a delay - why not that one. It's clearly not abusive, nor does it contain any dodgy language. I just don't understand. Help me please Ar-chant!

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • Always the case with TP if he loses he blames the ref!!

    Report this comment

    Albert Horton

    Monday, November 5, 2012

  • "point" that is - I need a "p"

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Wednesday, November 7, 2012

  • I thought it was shorthand for "wigwam". Tony Pulis = Spiny Lout.

    Report this comment

    Mad Brewer

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • OK - so that sensible comment was ethered. I'll wait till tomorrow to see if it does appear as promised - I have my doubts.

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • Should the caption for the picture be "If you want your ball back you'll have to come and get it !"

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • In the USA, TP means "Toilet Paper"

    Report this comment

    Swiss Canary

    Monday, November 5, 2012

  • Adam had dived six times before being booked. Not long before being booked, he was spoken to by the referee for "Delaying the restart of play" (yellow card offence) when he kicked the ball away from a Norwich free kick. Soon after this he was touched by Garrido (which is allowed) he threw himself onto the ground and grabbed the ball. The referee, rightly, gave a free-kick for handball and delaying play, about which he had just spoken to Adam. Charlie had been consistently committing yellow card offences and "Persistent infringement of the Laws of the Game" is a yellow card offence on its own. Given that he contuinued to fake fouls after the yellow card and in a similar incident to the Garrido one, dived after Bradley Johnson touched him and contrived to perform an acrobatic spin which ended in him kicking Johnno, frankly he was lucky not to be red-carded. Tony Pulis wants to get cheating out of the game. I think that his constant pressure on the officials based on a one-sided fantasy and supporting his own cheating players is one of the worst forms of cheating. The end.

    Report this comment

    Swiss Canary

    Wednesday, November 7, 2012

  • I thought it was shorthand for "wigwam". Tony Pulis = Spiny Lout.

    Report this comment

    Mad Brewer

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • Poor old Tony.

    Report this comment

    DocOhNo

    Monday, November 5, 2012

  • I thought it was shorthand for "wigwam". Tony Pulis = Spiny Lout.

    Report this comment

    Mad Brewer

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • So the "home" team won 1 corner to the "away" team`s 9. Sony Tulip should know all about kicks in the teeth. It`s what Stoke practice most at their training ground. What a whinger. Makes you glad we have a gent like Chris Hughton in charge here. OTBC.

    Report this comment

    Mad Brewer

    Monday, November 5, 2012

  • I also think Pulis ought to remove those rose coloured specs of his. During the challenge for the ball leading to the free kick, Wilkinson almost removed Snoddy's shirt. Once he had totally unblanced him, he let go - but by this time there was no way that Snoddy could remain upright. Yes Mr.Pulis there WAS a foul - but you are probably choosing to ignore the shirt-pulling. To be fair, newspaper reports keep referring to Wilko "clipping" Snoddy, but the foul was in the shirt-pulling - there may or may not have been further contact, but that's irrelevant as Snoddy fell from being unbalanced by the shirt-pulling.

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • Meanwhile what does Mr. P suggest referees do when there are fouls on the pitch? Leave them till Monday for a committee to decide whether a free kick should have been given? What a ludicrous idea. A referee has to be 100% certain about EVERY decision he makes. He doesn't give a goal, a penalty, a free kick or anything if he's not too sure. We might not agree with him, but he is sure in his own mind that he is right! 100% ! Mr P might like to consider a revolutionary concept if he wants take the pressure off referees. Stop the players cheating! Then the referees can concentrate on adjudicating on all the fair stuff that is part and parcel of the game!

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • Actually I believe the kick was aimed a good bit further south than that!

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

  • Thank you Swiss - my oint exactly - and much more eloquently put!.

    Report this comment

    The Crab

    Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
LocalSearch24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Weddingsite

Order your copy of The Canary magazine
Norwich City: History as it happened
Order your copy of Norwich City: History as it Happened
Read our digital publication

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT